Hemphill v. Unisys Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the plaintiff should amend his complaint to add the plan to assure he has stated an ERISA claim against a proper party
• prohibiting the plaintiff from calling new witnesses, who had not been present during the administrative review process, to testify concerning plaintiff's entitlement to benefits
• “Without a determination or written notice of denial, further appeal was not an available remedy.”
• in circumstances similar to this case, discovery “limited to evidence submitted to the administrator prior to the final denial of Hemphill’s claims or which otherwise tends to show an abuse of discretion”
• accrual date is denial of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).