Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 7/26/1982

Dennard v. Richards Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 681 F.2d 306
  • 3 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1769
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 17119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “factors to be considered in applying the arbitrary and capricious standard” include analysis of “reasonableness” of interpretation offered by plan administrators
  • “ ‘if the interpretation is unreasonable from the beginning, such an interpretation may still be arbitrary and capricious’ ”
  • “the fact that the [company’s] interpretation of the Plan is contrary to IRS interpretations lends support to a finding of arbitrary construction”
  • “When the trustee’s interpretation of a plan is in direct conflict with express language in a plan, this action is a very strong indication of arbitrary and capricious behavior.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.