George Straub v. Western Union Telegraph Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because “[plaintiff] is receiving the benefits to which he is entitled under the express terms of defendant’s employee benefit plan,” he had no claim under ERISA, even though there had been an oral representation that he was entitled to more

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).