Ninth Circuit· 4/12/2010
Hein v. Sullivan
Citations
- 601 F.3d 897
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7479
- 2010 WL 1427588
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “whether the comment was invited by defense counsel in its summation” is a factor in determining whether a comment resulted in a denial of due process
- applying Darden in part by concluding that sustained objections and cautionary instructions mitigated any prejudice caused by a prosecutor’s improper comments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andrew J. Kleinfeld and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges, and David G. Trager
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WARRIORSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-05-11· cited 121×
- United States v. WilkesNinth Circuit· 2011-10-19· cited 109×
- United States v. PelisamenNinth Circuit· 2011-04-13· cited 89×
- United States v. James WellsNinth Circuit· 2017-12-19· cited 69×
- Deck v. JenkinsNinth Circuit· 2014-09-29· cited 62×
- Earp v. CullenNinth Circuit· 2010-10-19· cited 44×
- Zane Floyd v. Timothy FilsonNinth Circuit· 2019-10-11· cited 26×
- United States v. Robert KahreNinth Circuit· 2013-12-05· cited 25×
- Victor Trillo v. Martin BiterNinth Circuit· 2014-10-06· cited 25×
- Stephen Deck v. Mack JenkinsNinth Circuit· 2014-09-29· cited 17×
- United States v. John MaloneyNinth Circuit· 2012-11-14· cited 14×
- United States v. Nancy MagenoNinth Circuit· 2014-08-11· cited 13×
- State v. RedcapCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2014-01-16· cited 13×
- Steven Catlin v. Ronald BroomfieldNinth Circuit· 2024-12-24· cited 13×
- Keith Ford v. Suzanne PeeryNinth Circuit· 2021-06-08· cited 12×
- Jensen v. HernandezE.D. California· 2012-03-30· cited 8×
- United States v. Alfred VelazquezNinth Circuit· 2021-06-23· cited 7×
- Roybal v. DavisS.D. California· 2015-12-02· cited 6×
- Keith Ford v. Suzanne PeeryNinth Circuit· 2020-09-28· cited 4×
- Young v. GipsonN.D. California· 2015-09-11· cited 4×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 4,161×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court· 2004-02-24· cited 1,098×
- William Anthony Brooks v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentEleventh Circuit· 1985-07-23· cited 282×
- Gary Benn v. John Lambert, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryNinth Circuit· 2002-02-26· cited 243×
- Blufford Hayes, Jr. v. Jill Brown, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinNinth Circuit· 2005-03-07· cited 184×
- Jackson v. BrownNinth Circuit· 2008-01-23· cited 184×
- United States v. Ben M. Hogan Co.Supreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 135×
- United States v. Ruben Zuno-ArceNinth Circuit· 2003-08-05· cited 123×
- People v. BadgettCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-06-08· cited 87×
- William Anthony Brooks v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterEleventh Circuit· 1987-01-16· cited 84×
- Jones v. GibsonTenth Circuit· 2000-02-15· cited 82×
- Ephen Whelchel v. State of Washington, Tana Wood v. Stephen C. Whelchel, Cross-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 2000-11-29· cited 82×
Other cases named Hein v. Sullivan
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.