United States v. Robert Kahre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he search warrant affidavits furnished probable cause to search for the enumerated items”
• noting that the defendant’s motion to suppress was “moot” when the seized evidence was not introduced at trial and further determining that the seizure of the evidence was valid
• \[P]roof of a conflict must be clear and convincing to justify removal of a prosecutor from a case.\
• same, where a search warrant for “all records” incorporated an affidavit that limited the search to “records” from “the period January 1, 1992, until December 31, 1993; and January 1, 1997 to present date”
• same, where a search warrant for “all records” incorporated an affidavit that limited the search to “records” from “the period January 1, 1992, until December 31, 1993; and January 1, 1997 to present date”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).