United States v. Pelisamen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases and explaining that no Court of Appeals other than the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has adopted the modified plain error standard of review
• rejecting a perjured testimony claim when, among other things, 5 “[n]othing in the record supports an inference that the government knew that [the] 6 testimony . . . was ‘false.’”
• whether a purported 1 that is, whether it ‘affected the outcome of the [trial] court proceedings.’”
• “While the standard of review for a trial court’s denial for a motion for a new trial is generally abuse of discretion, review is de novo when the asserted basis for a new trial is a Brady violation.”
• elements of conspiracy to commit wire fraud
• setting forth sufficiency-of-the-evidence standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).