Hein v. Merck & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s determination that clinical ecology testimony was inadmissible under Daubert
• “it seems a rather callous and unhelpful perspective when the issue before the factfinder is the loss of enjoyment of life of a particular individual. It seems obvious to this Court that some people enjoy life more than others.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).