KM Leasing, Inc. v. Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that any error in allowing hedonic damages expert to testify was harmless, as the testimony was not indispensable to the jury’s verdict, and there was sufficient other evidence on which the jury could have based its verdict
• interpreting Thomas to allow hedonic damages where decedent survived for some interval long enough to suffer hedonic damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).