Sullivan v. United States Gypsum Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Smith’s testimony would probably invade province of jury and is not amenable to analytical precision
• “The studies relied on by Mr. Smith do not use methodology designed to calculate the loss of enjoyment of life, yet are nonetheless extrapolated by Mr. Smith into what he claims to be valid data for calculating damages for ... loss of enjoyment of life.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).