Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1/22/1996
Norris v. State
Citations
- 469 S.E.2d 214
- 220 Ga. App. 87
- 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 398
- 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 52
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant’s argument that victim’s identification testimony “too contradictory and speculative” to support armed robbery conviction
- “companionship and conduct before and after the offense are circumstances from which one’s participation in the criminal intent may be inferred”
- presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the crime are circumstances allowing a jury to infer one’s participation in the crime
- “ ‘ “[t]he weight and credibility of witnesses are questions for the triers of fact” ’ ”
- “criminal intent may be found by the jury upon consideration of the words, conduct, demeanor, motive, and all other circumstances connected with the act for which the accused is prosecuted”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andrews, Blackburn, McMurray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Eady v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-07-25· cited 42×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-05· cited 32×
- Leigh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-12-03· cited 29×
- Dukes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-01-22· cited 24×
- Sledge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-10-18· cited 23×
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-10-23· cited 14×
- Cloyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-04-12· cited 13×
- Murray v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-10-05· cited 13×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-03-05· cited 12×
- Lemons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-12-03· cited 11×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-04-16· cited 10×
- Hardy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-11-19· cited 10×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-07-17· cited 9×
- Hefner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-02-12· cited 9×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-06-29· cited 9×
- Copeny v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-06-25· cited 8×
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-02-22· cited 6×
- Arrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-06-21· cited 5×
- Freelove v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-11-12· cited 5×
- Culberson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-16· cited 5×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-04-25· cited 240×
- Ranger v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-04-06· cited 98×
- Roseboro v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1988-03-03· cited 57×
- Drane v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-03-17· cited 53×
- Kimbro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-01-08· cited 36×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-09-08· cited 29×
- Lunz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-05-30· cited 25×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-09-15· cited 15×
- Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-03-11· cited 14×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-09-14· cited 11×
- Earl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-10-19· cited 10×
- Griggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-05-28· cited 8×
- Coggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-09-13· cited 7×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-02-24· cited 6×
- Perault v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-05-07· cited 6×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-11-08· cited 6×
- Nguyen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-09-06· cited 4×
- Millwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-05-24· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.