David Litmon, Jr. v. Kamala Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that California’s in-person 90-day lifetime registration for a sexually violent predators does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause
• holding that sexually violent predators are not similarly situated to other civil detainees
• concluding that “sexually violent predators” are not similarly situated to “mentally disordered sex offenders”
• holding California's 90-day, in-person lifetime registration requirement does not violate federal ex post facto principles
• holding California’s 90-day, in-person lifetime registration requirement does not violate federal ex post facto principles
• holding California’s 90-day, in-person lifetime registration requirement does not violate federal ex post facto principles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).