Skip to main content

Hudson v. State

Citations

  • 462 N.E.2d 1077
  • 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 2534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence supported jury’s verdict for dealing in a controlled substance and noting that the sole uncorroborated testimony of an informant-buyer is sufficient to convict, despite any arguable inadequacies in the control of the buy
  • “[T]he sole uncorroborated testimony of the informant-buyer is sufficient to convict, despite any arguable inadequacies in the controls of the buy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Conover, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.