Hartung v. Bradbury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court’s responsibility is to determine the redistrieting plan’s compliance with constitutional criteria and that “the court is not privileged to substitute its judgment about the wisdom of the plan”
• “In reviewing a plan of reapportionment, this court is not privileged to substitute its judgment about the wisdom of the plan.... Rather, our task is to determine whether the Secretary of State has complied with [all applicable law].”
• “In reviewing a plan of reapportionment, this court is not privileged to substitute its judgment about the wisdom of the plan. . . . Rather, our task is to determine whether the Secretary of State has complied with [all applicable law].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-03-09· cited 36×
• Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-10-21· cited 34×
• Californians for an Open Primary v. McPherson
  California Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 31×
• Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Redistricting Com'n Arizona Independent
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2009-05-20· cited 21×
• Chavez v. Brewer
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-21· cited 16×
• Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team v. Kitzhaber
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-07-09· cited 11×
• State v. Little
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-07-06· cited 11×
• Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team v. Kitzhaber
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-10-19· cited 8×
• Martinez v. Kulongoski
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-21· cited 7×
• Meyer v. Bradbury
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-04-26· cited 5×
• State ex rel Kotek v. Fagan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-04-09· cited 2×
• Davidson v. City of Cranston, RI
  First Circuit· 2016-09-21· cited 1×
• Az Minority Coalition v. Az Independent
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2009-05-20
• Hicks v. The 2021 Hawai'i Reapportionment Commission and Its Members.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2022-05-09
• Sheehan/Calderwood v. Legislative Assembly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-11-22

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• White v. Regester
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 771×
• Gaffney v. Cummings
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 507×
• Brown v. Thomson
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 283×
• Armatta v. Kitzhaber
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 119×
• Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery Commission
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-04-07· cited 102×
• Holmes v. Appling
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-05-25· cited 30×
• McCall v. Legislative Assembly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 20×
• Baum v. NEWBRY
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1954-03-02· cited 19×
• Hovet v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-09-30· cited 18×
• Ater v. Keisling
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-10-15· cited 13×