Hartung v. Bradbury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court’s responsibility is to determine the redistrieting plan’s compliance with constitutional criteria and that “the court is not privileged to substitute its judgment about the wisdom of the plan”
• “In reviewing a plan of reapportionment, this court is not privileged to substitute its judgment about the wisdom of the plan.... Rather, our task is to determine whether the Secretary of State has complied with [all applicable law].”
• “In reviewing a plan of reapportionment, this court is not privileged to substitute its judgment about the wisdom of the plan. . . . Rather, our task is to determine whether the Secretary of State has complied with [all applicable law].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).