Skip to main content

Hovet v. Myers

Citations

  • 489 P.2d 684
  • 260 Or. 152
  • 1971 Ore. LEXIS 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • strict compliance with the subsection (1) formula was unnecessary where adherence to county lines would result in an apportionment in violation of the federal constitution
  • challenge to the Secretary’s authority to depart from the constitutional formula in order to comply with the federal constitution
  • challenge to the Secretary's authority to depart from the constitutional formula in order to comply with the federal constitution
  • strict compliance with the subsection (1) formula was unnecessary where adherence to county lines would result in an apportionment in violation of the federal constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connell, McAllister, Denecke, Tongue, Howell, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hovet v. Myers

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.