Meyer v. Bradbury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] challenge to a proposed measure on the ground that it violates the separate-vote requirement may be brought before the election.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Californians for an Open Primary v. McPherson
  California Supreme Court· 2006-05-25· cited 31×
• Meyer v. Bradbury
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-09-07· cited 19×
• Bowers v. Betschart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-14· cited 2×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Priest v. Pearce
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 177×
• Application of Portland General Elec. Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-03· cited 120×
• Armatta v. Kitzhaber
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 119×
• League of Oregon Cities v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-10-04· cited 58×
• Oregon Medical Ass'n v. Rawls
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-02-08· cited 54×
• Ellis v. Roberts
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-09-24· cited 52×
• Foster v. Clark
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-03-21· cited 30×
• Lehman v. Bradbury
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-01-11· cited 27×
• Hartung v. Bradbury
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-10-18· cited 22×
• Swett v. Bradbury
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-04-11· cited 20×
• Oregon Education Ass'n v. Roberts
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 19×
• Dale v. Keisling
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-24· cited 15×
• Lowe v. Keisling
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-09-01· cited 14×
• Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team v. Kitzhaber
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-07-09· cited 11×
• Lowe v. Keisling
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-03-02· cited 10×
• Beal v. City of Gresham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-04-12· cited 3×