Baum v. NEWBRY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, without explanation, that a 1952 constitutional amendment “did not submit ‘two or more amendments’ to the voters” in violation of Article XVII, section 1
• applying Pacific Telephone and so holding
• applying Pacific Telephone and so holding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).