Skip to main content

Edwards v. State

Citations

  • 918 P.2d 321
  • 112 Nev. 704
  • 1996 Nev. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a sentence may be illegal where the district court did not have jurisdiction to impose it
  • recognizing that a sentence may be illegal where the district court did not have jurisdiction to impose it
  • holding that \a motion to modify a sentence is limited in scope to sentences based on mistaken assumptions about a defendant's criminal record which work to the defendant's extreme detriment\
  • holding that a motion to correct an illegal sentence is limited in scope to claims that challenge the facial legality of the sentence or that challenge the jurisdiction of the district court
  • explaining scope of motion to correct illegal sentence
  • describing scope of motion to correct illegal sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.