Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 840 N.E.2d 376
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 26
  • 2006 WL 73478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that while the trial court erred in failing to find the defendant’s mental illness as a mitigating factor, that error was harmless in light of multiple valid aggravating factors
  • holding that although the trial court erred in failing to find the defendant’s mental illness to be a mitigating factor, the error was harmless in light of multiple valid aggravating factors
  • concluding that defendant’s mental illness should have been given little weight where defendant was capable of controlling his behavior, did not have significant limitations on his functioning, and failed to identify a nexus between his mental illness and the offense
  • determining that Scott was able to control his behavior despite a lengthy criminal record and failed to establish a nexus between his mental illness and his crimes
  • holding defendant’s bipolar disorder was entitled to little weight as mitigating factor
  • determining Scott’s guilty plea was entitled to less weight because an eyewitness could identify Scott as the robber

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedlander, Vaidik, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.