Skip to main content

Pierce v. State

Citations

  • 949 N.E.2d 349
  • 2011 Ind. LEXIS 572
  • 2011 WL 2567545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing appellate review should focus on the “forest”—the aggregate sentence—rather than the “trees”—consecutive or concurrent, number of counts, or length of the sentence of any individual count
  • finding that both enhanced and concurrent sentences were improper
  • noting our “‘review should focus on the forest--the aggregate sentence--rather than the trees- -consecutive or concurrent, number of counts, or length of the sentence on any individual count’”
  • revising one-hundred-thirty-four-year aggregate sentence to eighty-year aggregate sentence where defendant’s criminal history included only one prior class C felony molestation conviction that occurred eight years before instant offense
  • revising one-hundred-thirty-four-year aggregate sentence to eighty-year aggregate sentence where defendant’s criminal history included only one prior class C felony molestation conviction that occurred eight years before instant offense
  • revising 124 year sentence on four counts of child molestation to 80 years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Sullivan, David, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.