Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 340 Ga. App. 865
  • 798 S.E.2d 498
  • 2017 WL 1025296
  • 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a period of roughly 44 years between the prior and charged offenses did not require exclusion under OCGA §§ 24-4-414, 24-4-403
  • holding that an expert in forensic interviewing of children’s testimony about recantation was not improper because it “did not directly address the victim’s credibility or express an opinion as to whether the child had actually been sexually abused”
  • holding that an expert in forensic interviewing of children's testimony about recantation was not improper because it \did not directly address the victim's credibility or express an opinion as to whether the child had actually been sexually abused\
  • evidence of molestation that occurred 44 years earlier relevant and admissible under Rule 414 to show pattern of molestation despite remoteness in time
  • evidence of molestation that occurred 44 years earlier relevant and admissible under Rule 414 to show pattern of molestation despite remoteness in time
  • molestation that occurred 44 years earlier admissible despite remoteness in time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reese

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.