Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 2000 OK CR 20
  • 13 P.3d 489
  • 71 O.B.A.J. 2675
  • 2000 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that jury be given specific cautionary instruction at time video or computer-based reenactment exhibits are presented
  • requiring that jury be given specific cautionary instruction at time video or computer-based reenactment exhibits are presented
  • finding that the probative value of a CGE was not outweighed by any Rule 403 dangers since “[t]hese [computer-generated] tapes cleared up the confusion and made the expert’s testimony easier to understand”
  • \The particular illustrative aids at issue here are similar in nature to posed photographs.\
  • \We believe that the South Carolina guidelines represent a model for Oklahoma trial courts.\
  • Daubert/ Kumho inquiry applies only to \novel\ scientific and technical methods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lile, Vice-Presiding, Johnson, Coneurs, Lumpkin, Strubhar, Chapel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.