Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 6/11/2003
Hanson v. State
Citations
- 2003 OK CR 12
- 72 P.3d 40
- 74 O.B.A.J. 1845
- 2003 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- parties have wide latitude in closing argument to discuss the evidence and reasonable inferences from the evidence
- parties have wide latitude in closing argument to discuss the evidence and reasonable inferences from the evidence
- expert testimony regarding a defendant's prison behavior admissible as mitigation to rebut continuing threat aggravating circumstance
- expert testimony regarding a defendant’s prison behavior admissible as mitigation to rebut continuing threat aggravating circumstance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chapel, Lile, Lumpkin, Strubhar, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hogan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-05-15· cited 263×
- Lott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-09-09· cited 123×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2010-03-05· cited 112×
- Stouffer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-11-14· cited 101×
- Dodd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-10-21· cited 93×
- Browning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-04-24· cited 89×
- Hanson v. SherrodTenth Circuit· 2015-08-13· cited 84×
- Lott v. TrammellTenth Circuit· 2013-01-14· cited 73×
- Glossip v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-04-13· cited 68×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2010-07-01· cited 64×
- Hancock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-03-09· cited 62×
- Eizember v. TrammellTenth Circuit· 2015-09-15· cited 57×
- Hanson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2009-04-13· cited 53×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2009-01-21· cited 49×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2013-09-06· cited 45×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2011-10-13· cited 44×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-04-24· cited 42×
- Coddington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2011-05-13· cited 38×
- Morgan v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 33×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2005-09-14· cited 29×
Cites
73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 4,617×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-04-23· cited 1,983×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 1,620×
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 1,584×
- Skipper v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1986-04-29· cited 1,534×
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1988-08-25· cited 1,289×
- United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 746×
- Romano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-12-19· cited 159×
- Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-05-17· cited 136×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1986-04-04· cited 126×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-31· cited 124×
- Blue v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1996-12-09· cited 116×
- Ledbetter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1997-02-21· cited 111×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.