Skip to main content

Hanson v. State

Citations

  • 2003 OK CR 12
  • 72 P.3d 40
  • 74 O.B.A.J. 1845
  • 2003 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parties have wide latitude in closing argument to discuss the evidence and reasonable inferences from the evidence
  • parties have wide latitude in closing argument to discuss the evidence and reasonable inferences from the evidence
  • expert testimony regarding a defendant's prison behavior admissible as mitigation to rebut continuing threat aggravating circumstance
  • expert testimony regarding a defendant’s prison behavior admissible as mitigation to rebut continuing threat aggravating circumstance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chapel, Lile, Lumpkin, Strubhar, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.