Tull v. Federal Express Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding computer-generated animation did not represent any substantive addition to expert’s testimony
• finding computer-generated animation did not represent any substantive addition to expert’s testimony
• \An animation can be thought of as a series of diagrams that have been strung together to produce a moving image.\
• \An animation can be thought of as a series of diagrams that have been strung together to produce a moving image.\
• \An animation can be thought of as a series of diagrams that have been strung together to produce a moving image.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).