Fifth Circuit· 3/3/1994
Harris v. Mickel
Citations
- 15 F.3d 428
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3856
- 1994 WL 45161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that federal law applies in a diversity action to determine postjudgment interest because the federal statutory rate is procedural in nature
- stating that state law governs the award of prejudgment interest in diversity cases
- “State law governs the award of prejudgment interest in diversity cases.”
- rejection terminates offer, and offer thereafter cannot be revived by tendering acceptance
- “State law governs the award of prejudgment interest in diversity case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, Garza, Jolly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Meaux Surface Protection, Inc. v. FoglemanFifth Circuit· 2010-05-18· cited 183×
- Figueroa v. DavisTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-04-08· cited 112×
- DP Solutions, Inc. v. Rollins, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2003-12-31· cited 96×
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. First Heights Bank, Fsb Pulte Diversified Companies, Inc. Pulte CorporationFirst Circuit· 2000-10-12· cited 62×
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.E.D. Michigan· 1999-07-30· cited 38×
- Advocare International, LP v. Horizon Laboratories, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2008-04-11· cited 37×
- Mitchell Energy Corporation, Maurice Sherman Bliss, Intervenors v. Samson Resources CompanyFifth Circuit· 1996-01-11· cited 36×
- Arete Partners, L.P. v. GunnermanFifth Circuit· 2011-06-09· cited 35×
- Qwest Communications International, Inc. v. AT & T Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-06-12· cited 29×
- Keiland Construction v. Weeks MarineFifth Circuit· 2024-07-25· cited 23×
- Teate v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkE.D. Texas· 1997-05-30· cited 17×
- Burlington Insurance v. Okie Dokie, Inc.District of Columbia· 2005-10-18· cited 17×
- Turkmani v. Republic of BoliviaDistrict of Columbia· 2002-10-28· cited 14×
- Hiner v. Koukhtiev (In re Koukhtiev)S.D. Texas· 2017-11-17· cited 8×
- Helen of Troy, L.P. v. Zotos Corp.W.D. Texas· 2006-10-18· cited 6×
- Mooneyham v. Progressive Gulf Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2005-09-06· cited 4×
- Center for Marine Conservation v. BrownS.D. Texas· 1995-11-16· cited 3×
- Washington Mutual Bank v. Crest Mortgage Co.N.D. Texas· 2006-02-28· cited 1×
- Burden v. Johnson & Johnson MedicalFifth Circuit· 2008-06-09· cited 1×
- Mitchell Energy Corp v. Samson Resources CoFifth Circuit· 1996-04-24
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 2,420×
- Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc., Cross-Appellee. Robert B. Weintraub, Intervenor-AppellantFifth Circuit· 1988-08-01· cited 91×
- Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. Texas Real Estate Counselors, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1992-02-20· cited 35×
- Travelers Insurance Company v. HillTexas Supreme Court· 1961-11-22· cited 9×
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1961-03-02· cited 4×
- United States v. SimpkinsE.D. Texas· 1970-06-10· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.