Skip to main content
· 3/3/1994

Harris v. Mickel

Citations

  • 15 F.3d 428
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3856
  • 1994 WL 45161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that federal law applies in a diversity action to determine postjudgment interest because the federal statutory rate is procedural in nature
  • stating that state law governs the award of prejudgment interest in diversity cases
  • “State law governs the award of prejudgment interest in diversity cases.”
  • rejection terminates offer, and offer thereafter cannot be revived by tendering acceptance
  • “State law governs the award of prejudgment interest in diversity case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Garza, Jolly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.