Mitchell Energy Corporation, Maurice Sherman Bliss, Intervenors v. Samson Resources Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that conversion claim failed because money that is not specific chattel is not personal property that could be converted
• “The right to payment for minerals already severed from the ground is considered personal property, not realty.”
• “Where money is involved, it is 2 See, e.g., Penda Corp. v. United States, 44 F.3d 967 (Fed. Cir. 1994
• “Under Texas law neither a cotenancy nor a lessor/lessee relationship imports a fiduciary relationship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).