Skip to main content
· 6/9/2011

Arete Partners, L.P. v. Gunnerman

Citations

  • 643 F.3d 410
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 11656
  • 2011 WL 2238536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that pre- and postjudgment interest rates are calculated the same under Section 304.003
  • explaining that cases have held that if plaintiff can access funds without condition, “there is no need to compensate him” with prejudgment interest “in the event he does not” but concluding that rule was inapplicable in that case
  • discussing Johnson & Higgins, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc., 962 S.W.2d 507, 530-531 (Tex. 1998)
  • “Thus, under Texas law, whether entitlement to prejudgment interest is derived from statute or, as in this case, equity, ‘prejudgment interest accrues at the rate for post-judgment interest and [is] computed as simple interest.’”
  • “Thus, under Texas law, whether entitlement to prejudgment interest is derived from statute or, as in this case, equity, ‘prejudgment interest accrues at the rate for post-judgment interest and [is] computed as simple interest.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Wiener, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.