Meaux Surface Protection, Inc. v. Fogleman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding amendment to add lost profits claim warranted to prevent substantial injustice because amendment was very important and Plaintiff would be “dead in the water” without it
• finding amendment to add lost profits claim warranted to prevent substantial injustice because amendment was very important and Plaintiff would be “dead in the water” without it
• affirming district court’s decision that “modification of the pretrial order was warranted to prevent substantial injustice” when “disallowing the amendment would have left [the plaintiff] dead in the water”
• where defendant would have suffered little prejudice and amendment was important to plaintiff's case, amendment was appropriate
• “[U]nder our rule of orderliness, we are obliged to follow our earlier decision . . . .”
• “In this diversity jurisdiction case, we review a jury verdict and judgment in favor of Plaintiff Meaux Surface Protection, Inc. (“Meaux”) on a claim for breach of fiduciary duty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).