Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 2/10/1994

Eason v. Thaler

Citations

  • 14 F.3d 8
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2115
  • 1994 WL 19109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that 17 surcharges imposed on health insurers were taxes because they were “paid into 18 the State’s general fund”
  • holding that as a predicate to the qualified immunity inquiry, \a plaintiff must establish that a particular defendant violated the plaintiff's federally protected rights.\
  • concluding that the district court abused its discretion in failing to provide the plaintiff with an opportunity to amend where the deficiencies in his complaint could have been remedied by “further factual development and specificity”
  • observing that a Spears hearing and a questionnaire are \unnecessary in cases where the facts alleged are 'fantastic or delusional scenarios' or the legal theory upon which a complaint relies is 'indisputably meritless.'\
  • vacating and remanding because the district court did not provide plaintiff with opportunity to offer more detailed set of factual claims
  • to pursue a § 1983 civil action against a defendant, plaintiff is required to state specific facts that the defendant violated plaintiff’s constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Davis, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.