Alexander v. Hawk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the courts cannot simply waive [the exhaustion] requirements where they determine they are futile or inadequate\
• holding that exhaustion is required even where prison grievance procedures do not afford specific relief sought by plaintiff, such as monetary damages
• holding that prisoner seeking injunctive and monetary relief is required to comply with the PLRA’s mandatory exhaustion requirement
• holding that the PLRA’s exhaustion requirement applies to federal prisoners bringing Bivens actions
• holding that exhaustion is required even where ultimate relief sought is not available
• explaining that the congressional mandate of exhaustion in the PLRA divested the courts of discretion to waive the exhaustion requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).