Supreme Court of Virginia· 6/6/2003
Harris v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 581 S.E.2d 206
- 266 Va. 28
- 2003 Va. LEXIS 54
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- physical contact between officer and suspect a relevant consideration under a seizure analysis
- whether extension of a lawful detention for a traffic infraction is consensual, i.e., whether a reasonable person would feel free to leave, is a mixed question of fact and law [citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699, 134 L. Ed. 2d 911, 116 S. Ct. 1657 (1996
- whether extension of a lawful detention for a traffic infraction is consensual, i.e., whether a reasonable person would feel free to leave, is a mixed question of fact and law [citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699, 134 L. Ed. 2d 911, 116 S. Ct. 1657 (1996)]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elizabeth B. Lacy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-05-06· cited 153×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-16· cited 101×
- Atkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-08-31· cited 85×
- Montague v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2009-11-05· cited 60×
- Copeland v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-02-10· cited 57×
- Brown v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-12-21· cited 53×
- Joseph Leon Matthews v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-11-03· cited 32×
- Jones v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2010-02-25· cited 31×
- Bandy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-08-12· cited 20×
- Middlebrooks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-08-05· cited 14×
- Atkins v. Com.Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-08-31· cited 2×
- Young v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2019-07-03· cited 1×
- Evans v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2015-09-17
- Jaquan Ramone Brown v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2022-09-06
- Commonwealth v. KadisonArlington County Circuit Court· 2004-01-14
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonNorfolk County Circuit Court· 2004-02-27
- Commonwealth v. CooperCharlottesville County Circuit Court· 2004-12-06
- Poulson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2025-04-10
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,950×
- United States v. DraytonSupreme Court· 2002-06-17· cited 1,084×
- McCain v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2001-04-20· cited 230×
- United States v. Furman Lattimore, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1996-06-25· cited 227×
- United States v. James Erwin, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 1998-09-17· cited 224×
- United States v. HernandezTenth Circuit· 1996-08-30· cited 219×
- United States v. Otis Lee Weaver, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2002-02-28· cited 174×
- Reittinger v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2000-06-09· cited 104×
- United States v. Bonnie Kaye LittleTenth Circuit· 1995-12-01· cited 72×
- Hart v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1980-08-28· cited 62×
- Bolden v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2002-04-19· cited 41×
- State v. ReadyNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-07-11· cited 39×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.