Skip to main content

Harrell v. State

Citations

  • 286 S.W.3d 315
  • 52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 819
  • 2009 Tex. LEXIS 321
  • 2009 WL 1567107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that due process satisfied when inmate received notice and an opportunity to be heard to challenge withdrawal orders
  • holding that a case involving the interpretation of section 501.014 of the Texas Government Code was not a \criminal law matter\ because it presented the issue of how to interpret and enforce a civil statute
  • holding that “proceedings to withdraw funds from inmate trust accounts are civil in nature”
  • holding that an inmate is entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard when the State attempts to withdraw funds from an inmate’s trust account; however, neither “need occur before the funds are withdrawn”
  • holding that inmate’s due process rights were not violated by withdrawal order when he received notice of withdrawal order on same day department of corrections received copy of order and had his concerns considered by trial court that issued it
  • concluding that case was “more civil than criminal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

279 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Harrell v. State

195 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.