Skip to main content

Harrell v. State

Citations

  • 689 So. 2d 400
  • 1997 WL 90818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • audiovisual technologies are currently utilized in Florida during presentments and arraignments in criminal cases
  • hearsay evidence is excludable because of its unreliability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt and Gersten, Jj., and Barkdull, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.