Supreme Court of North Carolina· 4/28/2023
Harper v. Hall
Syllabus
On petition for rehearing, whether the three-judge panel properly applied this Court's standards from Harper I in assessing the General Assembly's remedial redistricting plans and, more fundamentally, whether partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable under the North Carolina Constitution.
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1954-05-17· cited 3,819×
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 3,703×
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court· 2009-03-09· cited 2,505×
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,221×
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 1,218×
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court· 1960-11-14· cited 1,079×
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court· 1980-04-22· cited 783×
- Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court· 1968-04-01· cited 687×
- Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 507×
- Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. KnightSupreme Court· 1984-02-21· cited 489×
- Lane v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1939-05-22· cited 476×
- Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1966-04-25· cited 476×
- Mahan v. HowellSupreme Court· 1973-04-02· cited 441×
- Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court· 2004-04-28· cited 394×
- Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court· 1993-03-02· cited 379×
- Gill v. WhitfordSupreme Court· 2018-06-18· cited 372×
- Davis v. BandemerSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 371×
- Connor v. FinchSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 363×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.