Skip to main content
· 12/15/1982

Frausto v. State

Citations

  • 642 S.W.2d 506
  • 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a prosecutor may inform the jury panel of the range of punishment applicable if the State were to prove a prior conviction for enhancement purposes”
  • holding that “a prosecutor may inform the jury panel of the range of punishment applicable if the State were to prove a prior conviction for enhancement purposes”
  • reiterating that \a prosecutor may inform the jury panel of the range of punishment applicable if the State were to prove a prior conviction for enhancement purposes\
  • reiterating that “a prosecutor may inform the jury panel of the range of punishment applicable if the State were to prove a prior conviction for enhancement purposes”
  • prosecutor may inform jury panel of range of punishment applicable if State were to prove prior conviction for enhancement purposes, but may not inform jury of specific allegations in enhancement paragraph
  • prosecutor may inform jury panel of range of punishment applicable if State were to prove prior conviction for enhancement purposes, but may not inform jury of specific allegations in enhancement paragraph

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teague, Dally, Davis, Teag-Ue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.