Hankins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the passage of nine and a half hours did not favor either party
• holding that in assessing whether taint in the evidence is sufficiently attenuated, courts consider whether appropriate warnings were given
• concluding that the passage of nine and a half hours did not favor either party
• concluding that the passage of nine and a half hours did not favor either party
• holding that there were insufficient facts within the A four corners @ of the affidavit to establish probable cause
• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in quashing subpoenas for district attorneys because the defendant was not entitled to question them regarding the exercise of their “constitutional” discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

178 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Roberts v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-04-18· cited 866×
• Coble v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-13· cited 848×
• Russeau v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-29· cited 582×
• Segundo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-12-10· cited 348×
• State v. McLain
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-04-13· cited 343×
• Scheanette v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-09-15· cited 332×
• Flores v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-05-19· cited 258×
• Buntion v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-01-27· cited 191×
• Sorto v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-10-05· cited 189×
• Ford v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-10-27· cited 113×
• Whitaker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-06-24· cited 111×
• Russo v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-06-07· cited 95×
• Raymond Merril Jessop v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2012-04-19· cited 81×
• Crider v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-11-16· cited 65×
• Vafaiyan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2008-12-18· cited 56×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-22· cited 55×
• Crutsinger v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-05-10· cited 53×
• Scheanette v. Quarterman
  Fifth Circuit· 2007-03-27· cited 49×
• Gabriel v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-05-21· cited 49×
• Romo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2010-04-08· cited 39×