Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 207 S.W.3d 787
  • 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2295
  • 2006 WL 3391008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • swearing officer’s failure to sign affidavit did not invalidate it or warrant based on it when other evidence shows that the officer swore to the truth of the facts in the affidavit before the issuing magistrate
  • upholding validity of warrant where affiant failed to sign affidavit; “Although the affiant’s signature on an affidavit serves as an important memorialization of the officer’s act of swearing before the magistrate, it is that act of swearing, not the signature itself, that is essential.”
  • “When an individual swears under oath, society’s expectation of truthfulness increases and the legal consequences for untruthfulness—prosecution for perjury, for example—may be severe.”
  • doctrine states that court is to determine whether probable cause for issuance of search warrant was established based on the “four corners” of the affidavit
  • search warrant affidavit requires oath, not necessarily signature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Meyers, Price, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.