Skip to main content

Handley v. State

Citations

  • 515 So. 2d 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding Frye inapplicable when the expert evidence is in the nature of physical comparisons as opposed to scientific tests or experiments
  • finding Frye inapplicable when the expert evidence is in the nature of physical comparisons as opposed to scientific tests or experiments
  • forensic odonatologist testimony admissible as evidence is in the nature of physical comparisons as opposed to scientific tests or experiments
  • admissibility of dental witness's bite mark comparison does not depend on meeting the Frye standard
  • forensic odonatologist testimony admissible as evidence is in the nature of physical comparisons as opposed to scientific tests or experiments
  • forensic odonatologist testimony admissible as evidence is in the nature of physical comparisons as opposed to scientific tests or experiments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.