People v. Milone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert testified that in his opinion every person’s dentition is as distinct as his fingerprints; identification by matching dentition to bite mark found at scene is a “logical extension of [this] accepted principle”
• “Bite mark comparison evidence is currently admissible in at least thirty-five states.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).