Skip to main content

Hamilton v. State

Citations

  • 831 A.2d 881
  • 2003 Del. LEXIS 495
  • 2003 WL 22284929

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ―The prior rulings of a court must stand unless those rulings were clearly in error or there has been an important change in circumstance.‖
  • “The law of the case doctrine is not intended to preserve error or injustice.”
  • “The law of the case doctrine is not intended to preserve error or injustice . . . . [It] does not apply when the previous ruling was clearly in error or there has been an important change in circumstances, in particular, the factual basis for issues previously posed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Holland, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.