AT&T Corp. v. Lillis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in “ruling on a motion under Court of Chancery Rule 12(b)(6
• “We defer to the trial court’s findings as to the significance of the extrinsic evidence[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• TREMONT LLC v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
  S.D. Texas· 2010-03-11· cited 13×
• Cox Communications, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2022-03-03
• In re Dell Technologies Inc. Class V Stockholders Litigation
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2023-07-31
• Erik Holzbaur v. Trolley Square Hospitality, LLC
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2025-06-04
• 8908 Kanis Remainco LLC v. Gastroenterology and Surgery Center of Arkansas, P.A.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2026-04-15

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2005-06-28· cited 83×
• At&T CORP. v. Lillis
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-05-22· cited 80×
• Gannett Co., Inc. v. Kanaga
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2000-05-03· cited 71×
• Levinson v. Delaware Compensation Rating Bureau, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1992-11-25· cited 33×
• Insurance Corp. of America v. Barker
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-04-15· cited 32×
• Bruce E.M. v. Dorothea A.M.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-01-11· cited 31×
• Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc. v. Bruton
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-01-09· cited 26×
• Lillis v. AT&T CORP.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2005-08-26· cited 18×
• Hamilton v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2003-09-30· cited 12×