Skip to main content

Hall v. State

Citations

  • 546 So. 2d 673
  • 1989 WL 60790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant challenged sufficiency of State's evidence establishing identity of defendant
  • M.R.E. 611(c) should be more broadly interpreted than M.R.C.P. 43(b)(3)
  • M.R.E. 611(c) should be more broadly interpreted than M.R.C.P. 43(b)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Anderson and Blass

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.