Gathright v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he credibility of witnesses is not for the reviewing court.” (citing Davis v. State, 320 So. 2d 789 (Miss. 1975))
• The Court stated that “[tjhey [the jury] may accept in part and reject in part the evidence on behalf of the State or on behalf of the accused.”
• The Court stated that “[t]hey [the jury] may accept in part and reject in part the evidence on behalf of the State or on behalf of the accused.”
• “This Court has in numerous cases, too many to mention, said that when the evidence is conflicting, the jury will be the sole judge of the credibility of witnesses and the weight and worth of their testimony.”
• “This Court has in numerous cases, too many to mention, said that when the evidence is conflicting, the jury will be the sole judge of the credibility of witnesses and the weight and worth of their testimony.”
• “This Court has in numerous cases, too many to mention, said that when the evidence is conflicting, the jury will be the sole judge of the credibility of witnesses and the weight and worth of their testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).