Skip to main content

Coates v. State

Citations

  • 495 So. 2d 464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, where statement was impeachment evidence but also outlined defendant's substantive theory of the case, evidence was subject to the discovery rule, and the trial court's exclusion of the statement was not error
  • finding that, where statement was impeachment evidence but also outlined defendant’s substantive theory of the case, evidence was subject to the discovery rule, and the trial court’s exclusion of the statement was not error
  • relaxation of general rule and allowed evidence of similar sexual acts that had occurred on numerous occasions prior to the offense charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roy Noble Lee, P.J., and Robertson and Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.