Hall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Harris and Hass to uphold the prosecution’s use of the defendant’s Miranda-violative statement to impeach the defendant’s direct testimony that contradicted the statement
• \Maryland cases abound with instances where the plain error doctrine was advanced for a failure to instruct and where this Court subsequently denied review.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maine v. Moulton
  Supreme Court· 1985-12-10· cited 1,260×
• Conyers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-17· cited 137×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-31· cited 113×
• Rubin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-06· cited 102×
• Weber v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-01-17· cited 94×
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-15· cited 38×
• Franklin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-06· cited 35×
• State v. Luckett
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-04-14· cited 29×
• Martin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-28· cited 21×
• State v. Mills
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-11-14· cited 17×
• McCracken v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-31· cited 16×
• State v. Haynes
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-01· cited 10×
• Baltimore Sun v. Thanos
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-06-01· cited 9×
• Germain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-10· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Bandy
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-04-04· cited 5×
• State v. Haynes (Concurrence & Dissent)
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-01