Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/6/1990
Franklin v. State
Citations
- 571 A.2d 1208
- 319 Md. 116
- 1990 Md. LEXIS 49
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- overturning conviction because jury instruction that specific intent to kill was not required to establish crime of assault with intent to murder, was clearly erroneous
- overturning conviction because jury instruction that specific intent to kill was not required to establish crime of assault with intent to murder, was clearly erroneous
- taking cognizance of plain error in an instruction indicating that specific intent to kill was not required to establish assault with intent to murder
- plain error in jury instruction that specific intent to kill was not required to establish crime of assault with intent to murder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Adkins, Blackwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berry v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 255×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-05-17· cited 137×
- Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-06-24· cited 66×
- Richmond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-26· cited 63×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-08-15· cited 62×
- Unger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-24· cited 52×
- Moosavi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-30· cited 50×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-04· cited 47×
- State v. PagottoCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-16· cited 43×
- State v. DaughtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-05· cited 38×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-15· cited 38×
- Savoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-06-23· cited 36×
- Cirincione v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-02-02· cited 33×
- Christian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-30· cited 31×
- State v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-07-28· cited 23×
- Bane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-22· cited 16×
- McCain v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-03· cited 16×
- Smallwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-08-01· cited 13×
- McKay v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-30· cited 12×
- Abernathy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-27· cited 10×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-07-15· cited 210×
- State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-25· cited 131×
- Dawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-10· cited 120×
- Trimble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-17· cited 108×
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-10-07· cited 101×
- Squire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-04-15· cited 83×
- Gore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-04-01· cited 66×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-04-28· cited 61×
- Webb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1952-12-05· cited 53×
- Glenn v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-15· cited 49×
- Tate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-10-16· cited 43×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-04-29· cited 27×
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-07-13· cited 26×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-02-24· cited 22×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-05-13· cited 19×
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-09-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.