New Mexico Court of Appeals· 8/26/1992
Hall v. Hall
Citations
- 838 P.2d 995
- 114 N.M. 378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a court has jurisdiction post-judgment to enforce 6 a judgment
- noting that a court has jurisdiction post-judgment to enforce a judgment
- defining “[e]nforce” as “to compel obedience to, or to cause the provisions to be executed”
- “Jail time and fines may be imposed for civil contempt if their 5 purpose is to coerce compliance with court orders.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pickard, Donnelly, Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sickler v. SicklerNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-05-13· cited 180×
- State v. PonceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-12-06· cited 38×
- Ottino v. OttinoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-03-23· cited 36×
- Lebeck v. LebeckNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-07-29· cited 30×
- Rabie v. OgakiNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-05· cited 23×
- Mannick v. WakelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-08-24· cited 16×
- Cruz v. FTS Construction, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-06-29· cited 16×
- Hadrych v. HadrychNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-10-04· cited 16×
- Mannick v. WakelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-01-04· cited 15×
- Khalsa v. LevinsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-09-23· cited 10×
- PAPATHEOFANIS v. AllenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-06-30· cited 7×
- State ex rel. New Mexico State Highway & Transportation Department v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-12-02· cited 7×
- State v. BruleNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-06-25· cited 7×
- Estate of Nauert v. Morgan-NauertNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-02-23· cited 6×
- Atherton v. GopinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-06-18· cited 3×
- State v. BruleNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-07-28
- STATE EX REL. HWY. & TRANSP. DEPT. v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-01-12
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-02-29· cited 839×
- Rhinehart v. NowlinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-12-18· cited 56×
- Unser v. UnserNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-08-02· cited 44×
- Corliss v. CorlissNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-05-17· cited 37×
- Capell v. CapellSupreme Court of Virginia· 1935-03-14· cited 34×
- McCartney v. MeadCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1976-08-12· cited 34×
- Allen v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-09-30· cited 32×
- Benavidez v. BenavidezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-03-22· cited 31×
- New Mexico Department of Human Services v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-03-12· cited 29×
- Potter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1980-04-01· cited 29×
- Stone v. StidhamArizona Supreme Court· 1964-07-01· cited 28×
- Lipshy v. LipshyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-12· cited 27×
- Caillouette Ex Rel. Estate of Caillouette v. Hercules, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-01-17· cited 26×
- Stice v. SticeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-10-15· cited 23×
- Reed v. ReedArizona Supreme Court· 1957-04-09· cited 22×
- State v. PothierNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1986-06-23· cited 22×
- Matter of HookerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-10-22· cited 21×
- Lewis v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-05-21· cited 21×
- Burnham v. BrayIdaho Court of Appeals· 1983-03-22· cited 19×
- Mendoza v. MendozaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-08-29· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.