Arizona Supreme Court· 4/9/1957
Reed v. Reed
Citations
- 309 P.2d 790
- 82 Ariz. 168
- 1957 Ariz. LEXIS 207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a party’s “fail[ure] to adduce evidence of the value [of property] is not to be blamed on the trial judge”
- “If appellant was dissatisfied with the state of the record, it was his duty to further enlighten the court.”
- when the parties do not present evidence of the value of the property to be divided, “[t]he sole duty of the judge [is] to use his best judgment under the circumstances”
- \We are not impressed by a complaint that the trial judge was compelled to guess in order to arrive at a decision when his sole duty after both parties rested was to exercise his best judgment under the circumstances.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Udall, Windes, Struckmeyer, Prade, Phelps, Hon, Hyder, County
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nace v. NaceArizona Supreme Court· 1968-12-13· cited 47×
- Hatch v. HatchArizona Supreme Court· 1976-03-19· cited 47×
- Schlecht v. BlissOregon Supreme Court· 1975-02-21· cited 32×
- Matlow v. MatlowArizona Supreme Court· 1961-05-03· cited 29×
- Hall v. HallNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-08-26· cited 28×
- Britz v. BritzArizona Supreme Court· 1964-02-06· cited 22×
- Finck v. FinckCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-04-08· cited 14×
- Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1975-06-23· cited 14×
- Biddulph v. BiddulphCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-12-12· cited 10×
- Hatch v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-07-10· cited 7×
- Witherspoon v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-06-22· cited 5×
- Stauss v. StaussArizona Supreme Court· 1957-06-04· cited 4×
- Becchelli v. BecchelliCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-05-18· cited 4×
- O'Leary v. O'LearyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-08-22
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-07-03· cited 208×
- Schwartz v. DurhamArizona Supreme Court· 1938-06-20· cited 28×
- Vaughan v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court· 1955-02-02· cited 14×
- Honig v. HonigArizona Supreme Court· 1954-05-03· cited 14×
- Wigton v. WigtonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1923-04-02· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.