Skip to main content
· 2/29/1984

Matter of Adoption of Doe

Citations

  • 676 P.2d 1329
  • 100 N.M. 764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an appellant must submit both argument and authority in support of issues to present an argument for appellate review
  • holding that a party must submit argument and authority in order to present an issue for review on appeal
  • holding that an appellate court can assume that no authority supports a proposition when a party cites no authority to support it
  • holding that issues raised in appellate briefs which are unsupported by cited authority will not be reviewed on appeal
  • holding that an appellate court can assume that no authority supports a proposition when a party cites no supporting authority
  • holding that an appellate court will not decide an issue in a party’s favor if no authority is cited for the proposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riordan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.