New Mexico Court of Appeals· 6/29/2006
Cruz v. FTS Construction, Inc.
Citations
- 140 N.M. 284
- 2006 NMCA 109
- 142 P.3d 365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that one purpose behind the doctrine of priority jurisdiction is “to prevent vexatious litigation and multiplicity of suits” (alterations, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted)
- stating that one purpose behind the doctrine of priority jurisdiction is “to prevent 5 vexatious litigation and multiplicity of suits” (alterations, internal quotation marks, 6 and citation omitted)
- noting that the policy rationale behind the doctrine is “‘to ‘avoid[] conflicts that might arise between courts if they were to make contradictory decisions or awards relating to the same controversy, and [to] prevent[] vexatious litigation and multiplicity of suits’’’
- “A plaintiff cannot avoid the application'of res judi-cata where he or she brought a prior suit on the same cause of action in a court with a jurisdictional limit”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Castillo, Fry, Pickard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- White v. FarrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2021-01-11· cited 16×
- G.C. Wallace, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court· 2011-10-06· cited 12×
- Humphries v. PAY AND SAVE, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-03-11· cited 6×
- GC Wallace, Inc. v. EIGHTH JUD. DIST. CT.Nevada Supreme Court· 2011-10-06
- Freedom Mortgage v. StevensNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2023-02-21
- Triple R. Dev. LLC v. StinebaughNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2025-02-13
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Trujillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-09-08· cited 163×
- In Re ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-05-09· cited 97×
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-05-28· cited 88×
- Long v. McKinneyMississippi Supreme Court· 2004-12-02· cited 82×
- Deaton v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-12-18· cited 60×
- Delta Automatic Systems, Inc. v. BinghamNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-12-10· cited 58×
- Jiron v. MahlabNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-02-21· cited 49×
- Anaya v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-07-26· cited 47×
- People Ex Rel. Garamendi v. American Autoplan, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1993-11-24· cited 39×
- Robertson v. Carmel Builders Real EstateNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-11-21· cited 39×
- Chavez v. County of ValenciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-04-26· cited 35×
- Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co.N.D. California· 2005-05-04· cited 34×
- Stacy v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1946-11-25· cited 30×
- Hall v. HallNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-08-26· cited 28×
- Cordova v. LarsenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-05-19· cited 28×
- Plant Insulation Co. v. Fibreboard Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1990-10-16· cited 26×
- State Ex Rel. Kermac Nuclear Fuels Corp. v. LarrazoloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1962-10-05· cited 21×
- Rojas v. KimbleArizona Supreme Court· 1961-04-19· cited 20×
- Brooks Trucking Co. v. Bull Rogers, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-01-13· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.