Kephart v. Hadi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when statutory language is unambiguous, its meaning comes exclusively \from the words used without involving rules of construction or speculating as to what the legislature intended.\ (quoting Zuckerman v. Alter, 615 So. 2d 661, 663 (Fla. 1993))
• \The interpretation of a statute is a purely legal matter and therefore subject to the de novo standard of review.\
• \The interpretation of a statute is a purely legal matter and therefore subject to the de novo standard of review.\
• “The interpretation of a statute is a purely legal matter and therefore subject to the de novo standard of review.”
• \The interpretation of a statute is a purely legal matter and therefore subject to the de novo standard of review.\
• “The interpretation of a statute is a purely legal matter and therefore subject to the de novo standard of review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).